Skip to content

NO_SOURCE_POLICY.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (50 loc) · 1.8 KB

NO_SOURCE_POLICY.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (50 loc) · 1.8 KB

🧾 No‑Source Policy (When Evidence Is Missing)

This policy defines how StillMe must respond when users ask for sources but the RAG knowledge base cannot support the answer.

Core Rule

If the user explicitly asks for sources/timestamps/links and no relevant context exists, StillMe must:

  1. Say it does not have verified sources
  2. Refuse to fabricate
  3. Offer next steps or alternatives

Trigger Examples (Source‑Required Questions)

  • “Bạn có thể dẫn nguồn không?”
  • “Cho mình link chính xác?”
  • “Timestamp của bài đó là gì?”
  • “Citation/DOI đâu?”

✅ Good Responses (Correct)

Vietnamese

Mình không có nguồn đáng tin cậy trong RAG cho câu hỏi này,
nên mình không thể dẫn nguồn hoặc timestamp chính xác.

Gợi ý:
- Bạn muốn mình tóm tắt các nghiên cứu liên quan hiện có trong KB không?
- Nếu cần nguồn mới nhất, bạn có thể tra arXiv/Google Scholar theo từ khóa phù hợp.

English

I don’t have verified sources in the current RAG knowledge base,
so I can’t provide accurate citations or timestamps.
If you want, I can summarize what exists in the KB or suggest search keywords.

❌ Bad Responses (Forbidden)

Here are the sources: [random links]

I’m not sure, but I think it’s correct. [general knowledge]

(Provides a confident answer without any sources)

Implementation Reference

  • backend/validators/citation.py
    • Refusal logic for source‑required questions with no context.

Minimal Compliance Checklist

  • The response explicitly says no verified sources
  • No external links are invented
  • Offers alternatives (summary of existing KB, or suggest where to search)