[BUG] Card names are always shown although toggled off

[webdb22]

Which app is your issue for

CardWallet

Version

1.13.0

What platform are you using?

Android

OS Version

Android 16, One UI 8.0

What happened?

Although "Settings | Appearance | Always show card names" is toggled off, the card name is shown on all cards in the main view. The expected behavior would be that when activated the card names are shown, when deactivated the card names are hidden.

An additional expected behavior would be that for cards without an image added, the card names are always shown.

Relevant log output

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[farfromrefug]

@webdb22 actually here is the behavior :

• Always show card names => always show cards names
• NOT Always show card names => card name is visible if card name is not following default format, like if you set a special name to it

Is that ok with you? I am wondering about the "showing card name if not following default format". I had the case too where it seemed strange to me while using it. So i am not sure and opened to suggestion

About the card without image should show name. You are right! I thought it was like that. Will fix

[webdb22]

@farfromrefug thanks for your prompt reply and explanation!

Not sure what you mean by "not following the default format", my expectation would be that if "Always show card names" is OFF and an image has been added to the card, the card name should NOT be shown in the main view.

Another option would be to have a checkbox for each card like e.g. "Show Card Name", which is per default ON if there is no image, and gets automatically switched OFF as soon as an image is added, but can be also toggled manually,.

Currently the card name is always shown although "Always show card names" is OFF (see screenshot)

[farfromrefug]

@webdb22 it is because you renamed the card. By default cards are named based on the date. The name is though not shoen as following the default date format. This what I am talking about.

Not 100% what the best way would be.

[webdb22]

@farfromrefug thanks for clarifying the behavior based on the "default format"!

Maybe a dedicated "visibility" attribute would be more intuitive, like I described in #638