chore: reverts judge stripping behavior#1777
Draft
andrewklatzke wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Contributor
|
@launchdarkly/js-sdk-common size report |
Contributor
|
@launchdarkly/js-client-sdk-common size report |
Contributor
|
@launchdarkly/browser size report |
Contributor
|
@launchdarkly/js-client-sdk size report |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requirements
Related issues
https://launchdarkly.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/AIC/boards/2045?selectedIssue=AIC-2848
Describe the solution you've provided
This is a reversion of functionality that was added.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Reverts behavior from #1364 that stripped messages off of the judges and then re-created them.
Additional context
This was discussed and there are various concerns about this behavior. Since this is a semi-permanent solution once changes are applied on the server side we don't want to take this step yet.