Skip to content

README: Remove stale 'Check and Build' status#12635

Open
dveeden wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
dveeden:readme_build
Open

README: Remove stale 'Check and Build' status#12635
dveeden wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
dveeden:readme_build

Conversation

@dveeden

@dveeden dveeden commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #12636

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • No code

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 15, 2026

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the Build Status badge from the README.md file. Feedback was provided indicating that removing this badge without a replacement or explanation makes the project's CI status unclear. The reviewer suggested updating the badge URL if the workflow was renamed and requested that the pull request description be completed according to the repository's contribution guidelines.

Comment thread README.md
@dveeden

dveeden commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @OliverS929

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot requested a review from OliverS929 May 15, 2026 07:23
@dveeden

dveeden commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/check-issue-triage-complete

@dveeden

dveeden commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @GMHDBJD

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot requested a review from GMHDBJD May 22, 2026 06:07
@dveeden

dveeden commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @joechenrh

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented May 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dveeden: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: joechenrh.

Note that only pingcap members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

/cc @joechenrh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dveeden

dveeden commented May 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@GMHDBJD @OliverS929 PTAL

@dveeden

dveeden commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @wlwilliamx @lance6716

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot requested review from lance6716 and wlwilliamx June 9, 2026 07:12
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-06-09 07:22:21.63721666 +0000 UTC m=+858242.707534050: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Jun 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Outdated workflow in README

2 participants