Conversation
|
Um, no, alas. We had discussed this earlier somewhere. The problem with that transition is that it should only happen once all responses have been logged, and that requires conditional responses (#24) which aren't (currently) possible. In your proposed form, the whole process would be stopped as soon as first response was logged, which is not what we want. Right? |
|
@mpadge to clarify this is about the reviewer's response to the reviews, not the reviewers' responses to the author's response. 🤪 |
Yeah, I did get that. I was trying but failed to find a table I made somewhere of all of the label transitions and mechanisms needed for each. That had details of why 4 -> 5 could not be automated. Do you remember that? Do you have any idea where it was? |
|
Ouch, no, sorry. |
Adding aliases for assign and unassign
@mpadge do you think it is what's needed to prevent ropensci/software-review#698 (comment) (when the response had been submitted)?