Allow to use bold label by default for theorem env in non HTML or PDF output.#1206
Draft
cderv wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Allow to use bold label by default for theorem env in non HTML or PDF output.#1206cderv wants to merge 2 commits into
cderv wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
… output. This makes them same style as PDF or HTML output
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This would be a way to resolve #1202 and not reintroducing the
:This makes them same style as PDF or HTML output
This probably needs more testing but I think this will correctly only apply on non HTML / non PDF output.
However, once bold is the default, there is currently no way to change using a config.
We could make passing a function more generic (#1202 (comment)) to apply also on environments. This way the default function could be overwritten.
Creating this as draft for discussion