fix: replace adhak_bindi (u0A01) with bindi (u0A02)#1922
Open
BalkiratS wants to merge 1 commit intoshabados:mainfrom
Open
fix: replace adhak_bindi (u0A01) with bindi (u0A02)#1922BalkiratS wants to merge 1 commit intoshabados:mainfrom
BalkiratS wants to merge 1 commit intoshabados:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR normalizes 28 occurrences of the Gurmukhi adhak bindi character (ਁ, U+0A01) to the bindi character (ਂ, U+0A02) across 27 line files in collections/lines/.
The adhak bindi (ਁ) appears in only these 27 primary data fields out of ~141k line files in the database. After cross-referencing each line against two independent printed sources of Sri Guru Granth Sahib, the character appears as a standard bindi (ਂ) in both — suggesting the adhak bindi in the database is most likely an artifact of digitization rather than an intentional editorial distinction.
A full line-by-line audit with screenshots from both sources is attached:
Adhak_bindi_Audit.pdf