-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
SF-3772 Prevent duplicate onboarding requests #3784
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Nateowami
merged 1 commit into
master
from
feature/SF-3772-prevent-duplicate-onboarding-requests
Jun 3, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 Info: Race condition double-click guard is effective but adds a redundant network call
The race condition guard at line 219 (
if ((this.uiState as OnboardingFormUiState) === 'submitting') return;) correctly handles the double-click scenario. In JavaScript's single-threaded event loop: Click 1 awaitscheckAndWarnIfAlreadySubmitted, then proceeds to setuiState = 'submitting'. Click 2, which also awaitedcheckAndWarnIfAlreadySubmittedconcurrently, reaches line 219 and findsuiStateis now'submitting', so it exits. However, both clicks trigger a network call togetOpenOnboardingRequest, which is wasteful. A simpler approach would be to set a flag (or checkuiState) before entering the async check, but the current approach is functionally correct.Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Devin had a good point here, which I've addressed. However, note that the type system is overly optimistic and assumes the type of this.uiState can't be
'submitting'because we already added a guard for that. This is one of many instances where the type checker is overly permissive.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting.